Global warming vs Evolution
Page updated: Saturday, June 07, 2008
Disproving evolution is easy. Getting an evolutionist to accept that is what is hard. Evolutionist like to claim that "old earth (time-line)" is not a part of evolution. But yet if you ask one why all forms of evolution cannot be observed, then the subject of time becomes their answer. It takes to much time so therefore it cannot be observed, is the answer you will hear. So time and the claim about old earth is a major foundation for evolution just like abiogenesis is. Knock just one out and the theory ceases to work. This is because life cannot start without abiogenesis, and cannot evolve unless old earth theory is true because you got to have time. Gobs of time. So much time the average human being cannot even comprehend it (millions of years). So basically, all that time works because no one wants to question what they cannot comprehend.
By looking at the picture above, what do you conclude that the earth was "billions of years ago"? Very hot right? How hot would you say the atmosphere was when most of the surface of earth is molten lava? Really hot right? So now lets zip forward to present day.
Global warming is blamed on a global average temperature change of less than 3 degrees. Now 3 degrees is causing all the havoc in our weather like the global alarmist are saying. Now you look at that picture again and tell me what don't fit? One small change and the whole earth suffers, but what was the earth way back when? And Global Warming is caused by what? To much Co2, right? And our atmosphere was created by what?
Now how much Co2 do you think comes from that? And it took several of these to make our atmosphere, correct? But let's look at what a major volcano eruption does,
Facts vs the time excuse:
| What volcanoes do.
|| What old earthers tell you.|
| 1) The ash blocks out the sun.
|| 1) It took billions of years to adjust, everything was okay.|
| 2) No sun means it will get very cold.
|| 2) Same answer.|
| 3) No sun means no plants.
|| 3) Same answer.|
| 4) All the Co2 caused green house.
|| 4) Same answer.|
| 5) No ozone protection
|| 5) Same answer.|
So you see, time is the excuse where an answer is not viable. But, because there is no really written history of the earth that man observed. Evolutionist get to write their own history, call it fact, and because theirs will be the only viable existing story. That has millions of hours and billions of dollars spent on it. How do you challenge it? You point out that regardless of what they claim, they were not there to see it. So their "in the beginning" story turns into complete speculation solely based on what they "think" happened. This is how it had to happen is what they will tell you. But not one claim is provable, observable, or re-testable in a lab. It just is because time allowed it. And is what they will tell you. That answer is like saying: The "time fairy did it". Now you know why time is their friend. It allows them to use it and imply: Given enough time, anything is possible. That's like saying: given enough time, I can win the lotto ten times in a row using the same numbers. What this does is throw odds right out the door.
Odds are the enemy of evolution. It is the very reason when you bring up the odds factors, with all the variables, they will ignore it. And will refuse to address it. This is because they believe that the "Fairy god of time" made it all possible. And that some how this Fairy god of time cancelled out all the odds against, and poof it all happened just how we see it.
Click next to continue...